Entries by

Another Arbitral Look at Bill 168

In National Steel Car Ltd. v. United Steelworkers, Local 7135, Arbitrator Craven addressed a situation of workplace violence and the impact of Bill 168. The grievor was a radio control crane operator who worked under the direction of Al Gogo, a lead hand, and under the supervision of foreman Albert Cule. There was a history […]

Cause of Action for Invasion of Privacy Recognized in Ontario

In Jones v. Tsige, the Ontario Court of Appeal recognized the right to bring a civil action for damages for invasion of personal privacy. Two employees of the Bank of Montreal, Sandra Jones and Winnie Tsige, worked at different branches of the bank and did not know each other. However, Tsige had formed a common-law […]

Bird Richard Welcomes New Partner and Senior Associate

Bird Richard is pleased to announce that Annie G. Berthiaume has joined the Firm as a Partner and Lynne Poirier has joined as a senior associate. Annie was called to the Bars of Quebec and Ontario in 2002. Fluently bilingual, Annie represents employers in labour and employment matters and has appeared before various administrative tribunals, […]

New Privacy Tort Does Not Impact Employer’s Right to Employee Medical Information

In Complex Services and OPSEU Local 278, Arbitrator Surdykowski confirmed that, regardless of the existence of individual privacy rights, employers still have the right to request and even require that employees provided medical information in certain circumstances. The employer in this case had become concerned about the grievor’s mental health upon her return from a […]

Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench Says Charter Protects Right to Strike

A judge of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench has ruled that the right to strike is constitutionally protected by section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees freedom of association. Saskatchewan’s Public Service Essential Services Act (PSESA) prohibits public sector workers that perform essential services from striking. The legislation also […]

Supreme Court of Canada Ruling Prohibits Forum Shopping

The Supreme Court of Canada has clarified the test for determining whether a matter has been “appropriately dealt with” in another proceeding: the Court has confirmed that human rights tribunals cannot review human rights decisions of other administrative decision makers. In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, three injured employees had received compensation payments […]

“Fire Me Once, Shame on You – Fire Me Twice ……!!” Arbitrator Finds Post-Discharge Termination is not Void Ab Initio

In a recent decision, successfully argued by Bird Richard, Arbitrator Frumkin held that an employer could terminate an employee who had already been discharged. The Grievor, a letter carrier, had been terminated for abusive conduct to a customer. At the disciplinary meeting, after being told that he was discharged and handed the discharge letter, the […]

Accommodation Efforts by Employees Results in Discipline

When a training session was being conducted on the second floor of a local hardware store, a few employees realized that their wheelchair-bound colleague would be unable to attend. The colleague requested that they strap him in his wheelchair onto a forklift, in order to hoist him onto the second floor. They gladly obliged. At […]

Employer Liability to Provide Safe Workplace is a Perpetual One

In R. v. Corporation (City of Guelph), the Ontario Court of Justice declared that an employer’s duty to maintain a safe workplace is a continuing one to which no time limitations apply. In 2003, the City of Guelph undertook to construct a building in one of its parks. An architect and engineer were hired for […]