Bird Richard is centrally located in Ottawa and serves clients nationally. Our clients range from large Crown Corporations with national operations to small local construction firms. We also provide services to corporations in Alberta, in the Northwest Territories and in Nunavut.
In McKee v. Reid’s Heritage Homes Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that there is an intermediate category between the categories of employee and independent contractor, and altered the traditional analysis used to determine into which class an individual falls. Elizabeth McKee was a salesperson for Reid’s Heritage Homes. She received money from Reid’s […]
The Ontario Government has appointed an expert advisory panel to conduct a comprehensive review of the provincial occupational health and safety system. The panel consists of safety experts from labour groups, employers, and academic institutions, and will provide recommendations for operational, policy and structural improvements. In particular, the panel will examine workplace safety practices and […]
In Greater Toronto Airports Authority v. Public Service Alliance of Canada, Local 0004, Arbitrator Owen Shime ordered the GTAA to pay over $500,000 in damages for its bad faith conduct in wrongfully terminating a unionized employee for suspected abuse of sick leave. The grievor had worked for the GTAA for over 23 years, and had […]
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and upheld the Federal Court’s ruling that set aside the decision of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) granting pay equity to the female employees. In 1983, PSAC had filed a complaint on behalf of the Clerical and Regulatory […]
The Ontario Court of Appeal has become the first appellate court in Canada to rule on whether there is a free-standing cause of action against employers for negligent infliction of mental harm in the workplace. The Court of Appeal overturned the Ontario Superior Court’s groundbreaking 2008 decision in Piresferreira v. Ayotte, and pronounced that the […]
On March 11, 2010 Canada ratified the United Nations’ International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Convention is an international human rights instrument to protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. Its chief goal is to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion in society for people with disabilities. […]
In Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Attorney General of Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada granted the Commission leave to appeal from the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal, in which that court found that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) did not have the jurisdiction to award legal costs. The complainant, Donna […]
In Arasteh v. Best Buy Canada Ltd., the British Columbia Supreme Court confirmed that a termination clause contained in an employee handbook which limits the amount of notice of termination owing to an employee was enforceable. Mr. Arasteh worked for Best Buy for six years before he was terminated for poor performance. The trial judge […]
The Firm welcomes our new Associate, Peter MacTavish. Peter worked as in-house counsel for one of our large crown corporation clients. Peter brings to the Firm a full range of expertise in labour and employment law. We also welcome our new Articling Student, Katherine Symonds.
On May 25th, 2010, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-29, which will alter the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”). The changes to the federal private sector privacy legislation are the result of a parliamentary review of the legislation that occurred in 2007. Among the proposed amendments are changes which include: mandatory […]
Bird Richard recognizes the importance of privacy and the sensitivity of personal information it collects about its employees and clients. READ MORE >>>
508-130 Albert St,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5G4
T: 613-238-3772
F: 613-238-5955
Before you send an e-mail to Bird Richard, please be aware that your communications with us through this message will not create a lawyer-client relationship with us. Do not send us any information that you or anyone else considers to be confidential or secret unless we have first agreed to be your lawyers in that matter. Any information you send us before we agree to be your lawyers cannot be protected from disclosure.